Screener
TAXF vs PWZ
American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF vs Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
- TAXF follows a active selection strategy; PWZ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, TAXF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PWZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TAXF | PWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $627M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2018 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.82% | 3.57% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.0% | +6.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.6% | +2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.9% | -0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.03 | -0.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.09% | 4.39% |
| Max drawdown | -13.94% | -17.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TAXF and PWZ
Explore further