Screener
TBLL vs INTM
Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF vs Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF
Key differences
- TBLL costs 0.27% less per year.
- TBLL is significantly larger than INTM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TBLL follows a index tracking strategy; INTM uses active selection.
- TBLL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TBLL | INTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $101M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.82% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.09 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.19% | — |
| Max drawdown | -0.64% | -2.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TBLL and INTM
Explore further