Screener
TCHI vs IGM
iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF vs iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Key differences
- IGM costs 0.20% less per year.
- IGM is significantly larger than TCHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TCHI covers emerging markets markets; IGM covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IGM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TCHI | IGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $45M | $9.5B |
| Since | 2022 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 2.41% | 0.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.1% | +59.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +39.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +21.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 1.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.65% | 20.34% |
| Max drawdown | -43.96% | -40.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TCHI and IGM
Explore further