Screener
TDVG vs XUDV
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF vs Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF
Key differences
- XUDV costs 0.41% less per year.
- TDVG is significantly larger than XUDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TDVG follows a active selection strategy; XUDV uses index tracking.
- TDVG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TDVG | XUDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $64M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 3.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.1% | +32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.81% | 12.27% |
| Max drawdown | -19.20% | -15.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TDVG and XUDV
Explore further