Screener
TEQI vs IFGL
T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF vs iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF
Key differences
- IFGL costs 0.06% less per year.
- TEQI is significantly larger than IFGL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TEQI covers north america markets; IFGL covers global.
- TEQI follows a active selection strategy; IFGL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, TEQI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IFGL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TEQI | IFGL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $403M | $88M |
| Since | 2020 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.57% | 3.68% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.4% | +11.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.8% | -1.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.61% | 13.68% |
| Max drawdown | -17.82% | -40.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TEQI and IFGL
Explore further