Screener
TFLO vs ICSH
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF vs iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- ICSH costs 0.07% less per year.
- TFLO follows a index tracking strategy; ICSH uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| TFLO | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.7B | $7.3B |
| Since | 2014 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 3.99% | 4.41% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.8% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.6% | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 3.59 | 3.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.29% | 0.41% |
| Max drawdown | -0.16% | -3.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TFLO and ICSH
Explore further