Screener
THIR vs DFAC
THOR Index Rotation ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
Key differences
- DFAC costs 0.52% less per year.
- DFAC is significantly larger than THIR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- THIR follows a index tracking strategy; DFAC uses active selection.
- DFAC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| THIR | DFAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $210M | $44.5B |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 0.95% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.0% | +29.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.55% | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -10.05% | -23.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to THIR and DFAC
Explore further