Screener
THIR vs GKAT
THOR Index Rotation ETF vs Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- GKAT costs 0.10% less per year.
- THIR follows a index tracking strategy; GKAT uses active selection.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| THIR | GKAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $210M | $158M |
| Since | 2024 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.55% | — |
| Max drawdown | -10.05% | -10.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to THIR and GKAT
Explore further