Screener
THIR vs RULE
THOR Index Rotation ETF vs Adaptive Core ETF
Key differences
- THIR costs 1.15% less per year.
- THIR is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- THIR is classified as equity, while RULE is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- THIR follows a index tracking strategy; RULE uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| THIR | RULE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 1.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $210M | $14M |
| Since | 2024 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.0% | +41.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.55% | 19.69% |
| Max drawdown | -10.05% | -30.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to THIR and RULE
Explore further