Screener
THLV vs BCSM
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF vs Baron SMID Cap ETF
Key differences
- THLV costs 0.11% less per year.
- THLV follows a active selection strategy; BCSM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| THLV | BCSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $58M | $29M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.64% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.95% | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.15% | -17.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to THLV and BCSM
Explore further