Screener
THMZ vs EMKT
Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF vs Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- THMZ costs 0.24% less per year.
- EMKT is significantly larger than THMZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- THMZ follows a active selection strategy; EMKT uses index tracking.
- EMKT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| THMZ | EMKT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.74% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $156M |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | — |
| Max drawdown | -15.99% | -14.21% |
Similar to THMZ and EMKT
Explore further