Screener
THNQ vs CGGR
Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF vs Capital Group Growth ETF
Key differences
- CGGR costs 0.29% less per year.
- CGGR is significantly larger than THNQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- THNQ follows a index tracking strategy; CGGR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, THNQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| THNQ | CGGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $322M | $22.2B |
| Since | 2020 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +71.0% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +38.5% | +26.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.07% | 16.35% |
| Max drawdown | -50.56% | -28.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to THNQ and CGGR
Explore further