Screener
THNQ vs ROBO
Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF vs Robo Global Robotics and Automation Index ETF
Key differences
- THNQ costs 0.27% less per year.
- ROBO is significantly larger than THNQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- THNQ follows a index tracking strategy; ROBO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, THNQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ROBO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| THNQ | ROBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $322M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2020 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +68.3% | +57.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +38.6% | +17.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.4% | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.96% | 22.95% |
| Max drawdown | -50.56% | -43.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to THNQ and ROBO
Explore further