Screener
THRO vs CSHP
iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF vs iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- CSHP costs 0.37% less per year.
- THRO is significantly larger than CSHP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- THRO is classified as equity, while CSHP is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- THRO covers north america markets; CSHP covers global.
- THRO follows a active selection strategy; CSHP uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| THRO | CSHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.3B | $190M |
| Since | 2021 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | 5.10% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.11% | 0.33% |
| Max drawdown | -26.55% | -0.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to THRO and CSHP
Explore further