Screener
THRO vs HYDB
iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF vs iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
Key differences
- HYDB costs 0.22% less per year.
- THRO is significantly larger than HYDB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- THRO is classified as equity, while HYDB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- THRO follows a active selection strategy; HYDB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, THRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| THRO | HYDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.3B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | 7.11% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.9% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.11% | 3.82% |
| Max drawdown | -26.55% | -21.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to THRO and HYDB
Explore further