Screener
THRO vs IMTB
iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF vs iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- IMTB costs 0.51% less per year.
- THRO is significantly larger than IMTB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- THRO is classified as equity, while IMTB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- THRO follows a active selection strategy; IMTB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, THRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IMTB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| THRO | IMTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.3B | $280M |
| Since | 2021 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | 4.46% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +6.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.9% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | 0.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.11% | 4.07% |
| Max drawdown | -26.55% | -18.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to THRO and IMTB
Explore further