Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

THRO vs MANI

iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF vs Man Active Income ETF

THRO

iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF

BlackRock

Annual cost

0.57%

Fund size

$8.3B

MANI

Man Active Income ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

Key differences

  • THRO is classified as equity, while MANI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • THRO covers north america markets; MANI covers emerging markets.
  • THRO follows a active selection strategy; MANI uses long short.

Side-by-side comparison

THROMANI
Annual cost (TER)0.57%
Fund size (AUM)$8.3B
Since2021
Dividend yield0.17%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americaemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionlong short
CAGR 1Y+28.9%N/A
CAGR 3Y+24.9%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.26N/A
Volatility 1Y13.11%
Max drawdown-26.55%-0.73%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to THRO and MANI