Screener
THRO vs PSTR
iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF vs PeakShares Sector Rotation ETF
Key differences
- THRO costs 0.50% less per year.
- THRO is significantly larger than PSTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- THRO is classified as equity, while PSTR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- THRO follows a active selection strategy; PSTR uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| THRO | PSTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 1.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.3B | $57M |
| Since | 2021 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | 4.75% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +19.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.11% | 8.43% |
| Max drawdown | -26.55% | -14.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to THRO and PSTR
Explore further