Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

THRO vs SHV

iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF vs iShares 0–1 Year Treasury Bond ETF

THRO

iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF

BlackRock

Annual cost

0.57%

Fund size

$8.3B

SHV

iShares 0–1 Year Treasury Bond ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$20.6B

Key differences

  • SHV costs 0.42% less per year.
  • THRO is classified as equity, while SHV is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
  • THRO follows a active selection strategy; SHV uses index tracking.
  • Over the last 3 years, THRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • SHV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

THROSHV
Annual cost (TER)0.57%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$8.3B$20.6B
Since20212007
Dividend yield0.17%3.92%
Asset classequityfixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+28.9%+3.9%
CAGR 3Y+24.9%+4.7%
CAGR 5YN/A+3.3%
Sharpe 3Y1.264.34
Volatility 1Y13.11%0.21%
Max drawdown-26.55%-0.45%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to THRO and SHV