Screener
TINT vs PSCM
ProShares Smart Materials ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
Key differences
- PSCM costs 0.29% less per year.
- PSCM is significantly larger than TINT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PSCM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PSCM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TINT | PSCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $21M |
| Since | 2021 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.03% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +50.2% | +66.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.42 | 0.68 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.73% | 24.10% |
| Max drawdown | -41.29% | -51.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TINT and PSCM
Explore further