Screener
TLH vs NEAR
iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF vs iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- TLH costs 0.10% less per year.
- TLH follows a index tracking strategy; NEAR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, NEAR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TLH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TLH | NEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12.1B | $4.3B |
| Since | 2007 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 4.39% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +0.0% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -3.6% | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.25 | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.14% | 1.37% |
| Max drawdown | -41.14% | -9.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TLH and NEAR
Explore further