Screener
TLT vs IBHK
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF vs iShares iBonds 2031 Term High Y
Key differences
- TLT costs 0.20% less per year.
- TLT is significantly larger than IBHK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TLT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TLT | IBHK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42.9B | $57M |
| Since | 2002 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.57% | 6.59% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.4% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.35 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.95% | 4.13% |
| Max drawdown | -48.35% | -4.83% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TLT and IBHK
Explore further