Screener
TLT vs ICSH
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF vs iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- ICSH costs 0.07% less per year.
- TLT is significantly larger than ICSH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TLT follows a index tracking strategy; ICSH uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ICSH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TLT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TLT | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42.9B | $7.3B |
| Since | 2002 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 4.57% | 4.41% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.4% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.3% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.1% | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.35 | 3.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.95% | 0.41% |
| Max drawdown | -48.35% | -3.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TLT and ICSH
Explore further