Screener
TLT vs TAXF
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF vs American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
- TLT costs 0.12% less per year.
- TLT is significantly larger than TAXF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TLT follows a index tracking strategy; TAXF uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, TAXF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TLT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TLT | TAXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42.9B | $627M |
| Since | 2002 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 4.57% | 3.82% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +7.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | -1.6% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -5.8% | +1.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.30 | 0.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.95% | 3.13% |
| Max drawdown | -48.35% | -13.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TLT and TAXF
Explore further