Screener
TLTX vs BWZ
Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
- TLTX costs 0.06% less per year.
- BWZ is significantly larger than TLTX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TLTX is classified as alternative, while BWZ is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- TLTX follows a option income strategy; BWZ uses index tracking.
- BWZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TLTX | BWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $324M |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.02% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +0.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +2.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 7.03% |
| Max drawdown | -6.35% | -24.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TLTX and BWZ
Explore further