Screener
TMAT vs ANEW
Main Thematic Innovation ETF vs ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF
Key differences
TMAT is an alternative ETF, while ANEW is an equity ETF. TMAT charges 0.82% a year and ANEW 0.45%.
- TMAT is an alternative fund, while ANEW is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- TMAT follows a option income strategy; ANEW uses index tracking.
- ANEW costs 0.37% less per year.
- TMAT is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, TMAT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMAT | ANEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.82% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $8M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | 0.61% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.5% | +2.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.3% | +13.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.6% | +3.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 0.68 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.00% | 13.47% |
| Max drawdown | -58.55% | -39.87% |
Similar to TMAT and ANEW
Explore further