Screener
TMAT vs CGGO
Main Thematic Innovation ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGGO costs 0.35% less per year.
- CGGO is significantly larger than TMAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMAT is classified as alternative, while CGGO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- TMAT covers north america markets; CGGO covers global.
- TMAT follows a option income strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, TMAT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMAT | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.82% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $10.1B |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.6% | +38.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.7% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.16% | 16.82% |
| Max drawdown | -58.55% | -24.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMAT and CGGO
Explore further