Screener
TMAT vs CWS
Main Thematic Innovation ETF vs AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF
Key differences
- CWS costs 0.17% less per year.
- TMAT is classified as alternative, while CWS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- TMAT follows a option income strategy; CWS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, TMAT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMAT | CWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.82% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $155M |
| Since | 2021 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | 0.31% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.0% | -0.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.6% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | 0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.91% | 13.34% |
| Max drawdown | -58.55% | -33.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMAT and CWS
Explore further