Screener
TMAT vs DFUV
Main Thematic Innovation ETF vs Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
Key differences
- DFUV costs 0.61% less per year.
- DFUV is significantly larger than TMAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMAT is classified as alternative, while DFUV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- TMAT follows a option income strategy; DFUV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, TMAT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFUV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMAT | DFUV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.82% | 0.21% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $14.4B |
| Since | 2021 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.0% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.6% | +19.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.91% | 11.87% |
| Max drawdown | -58.55% | -17.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMAT and DFUV
Explore further