Screener
TMAT vs KONG
Main Thematic Innovation ETF vs Formidable Fortress ETF
Key differences
- TMAT costs 0.07% less per year.
- TMAT is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, TMAT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMAT | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.82% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $22M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.0% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.6% | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | 0.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.91% | 10.91% |
| Max drawdown | -58.55% | -19.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMAT and KONG
Explore further