Screener
TMAT vs SCHC
Main Thematic Innovation ETF vs Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- SCHC costs 0.74% less per year.
- SCHC is significantly larger than TMAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMAT is classified as alternative, while SCHC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- TMAT covers north america markets; SCHC covers global ex us.
- TMAT follows a option income strategy; SCHC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, TMAT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMAT | SCHC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.82% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $5.5B |
| Since | 2021 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | 3.34% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.6% | +32.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.7% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | +7.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.16% | 15.52% |
| Max drawdown | -58.55% | -43.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMAT and SCHC
Explore further