Screener
TMDV vs CGDV
ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF vs Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Key differences
- CGDV is significantly larger than TMDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMDV follows a index tracking strategy; CGDV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGDV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMDV | CGDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $33.0B |
| Since | 2019 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.58% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.3% | +33.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.2% | +25.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.18 | 1.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.22% | 11.75% |
| Max drawdown | -33.42% | -21.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMDV and CGDV
Explore further