Screener
TMDV vs SDIV
ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF vs Global X SuperDividend ETF
Key differences
- TMDV costs 0.23% less per year.
- SDIV is significantly larger than TMDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SDIV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SDIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMDV | SDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2019 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.58% | 8.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.3% | +30.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.2% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.7% | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.18 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.22% | 12.36% |
| Max drawdown | -33.42% | -56.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMDV and SDIV
Explore further