Screener
TMED vs FHLC
T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF vs Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF
Key differences
- FHLC costs 0.36% less per year.
- FHLC is significantly larger than TMED — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMED covers global markets; FHLC covers north america.
- TMED follows a active selection strategy; FHLC uses index tracking.
- FHLC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMED | FHLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +17.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.23% |
| Max drawdown | -11.11% | -28.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMED and FHLC
Explore further