Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

TMED vs PPH

T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF vs VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF

TMED

T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

T. Rowe Price

Annual cost

0.44%

Fund size

$19M

PPH

VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.36%

Fund size

$966M

Key differences

  • PPH costs 0.08% less per year.
  • PPH is significantly larger than TMED — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • TMED covers global markets; PPH covers north america.
  • TMED follows a active selection strategy; PPH uses index tracking.
  • PPH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

TMEDPPH
Annual cost (TER)0.44%0.36%
Fund size (AUM)$19M$966M
Since20252011
Dividend yield2.12%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1YN/A+24.2%
CAGR 3YN/A+12.4%
CAGR 5YN/A+9.9%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.61
Volatility 1Y17.11%
Max drawdown-11.11%-29.70%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to TMED and PPH