Screener
TMFC vs FESM
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- FESM costs 0.22% less per year.
- TMFC follows a index tracking strategy; FESM uses index enhanced.
- FESM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFC | FESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $5.0B |
| Since | 2018 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 0.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.7% | +52.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.31 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.72% | 19.05% |
| Max drawdown | -33.06% | -26.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFC and FESM
Explore further