Screener
TMFC vs FORH
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF vs Formidable ETF
Key differences
- TMFC costs 0.69% less per year.
- TMFC is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFC is classified as equity, while FORH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- TMFC follows a index tracking strategy; FORH uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, TMFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFC | FORH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 1.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $20M |
| Since | 2018 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.7% | +13.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.4% | +3.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.5% | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.31 | 0.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.72% | 15.66% |
| Max drawdown | -33.06% | -20.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFC and FORH
Explore further