Screener
TMFC vs STXG
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF vs Strive 1000 Growth ETF
Key differences
- STXG costs 0.32% less per year.
- TMFC is significantly larger than STXG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, TMFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFC | STXG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $145M |
| Since | 2018 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 0.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +30.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.1% | +24.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.30 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.69% | 14.58% |
| Max drawdown | -33.06% | -21.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFC and STXG
Explore further