Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

TMFE vs LRGF

Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF

TMFE

Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF

Motley Fool

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$84M

LRGF

iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.08%

Fund size

$3.3B

Key differences

  • LRGF costs 0.42% less per year.
  • LRGF is significantly larger than TMFE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • TMFE follows a index tracking strategy; LRGF uses index enhanced.
  • Over the last 3 years, LRGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • LRGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

TMFELRGF
Annual cost (TER)0.50%0.08%
Fund size (AUM)$84M$3.3B
Since20212015
Dividend yield0.32%1.13%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex enhanced
CAGR 1Y+10.2%+25.4%
CAGR 3Y+21.1%+23.4%
CAGR 5YN/A+13.8%
Sharpe 3Y1.071.23
Volatility 1Y12.24%12.16%
Max drawdown-31.07%-36.03%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to TMFE and LRGF