Screener
TMFG vs MFSV
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF vs MFS Active Value ETF
Key differences
- MFSV costs 0.41% less per year.
- TMFG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFG | MFSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $360M | $443M |
| Since | 2014 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.26% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.9% | +14.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.15% | 10.34% |
| Max drawdown | -33.66% | -12.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFG and MFSV
Explore further