Screener
TMFG vs MFVL
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF vs Motley Fool Value Factor ETF
Key differences
- MFVL costs 0.35% less per year.
- TMFG is significantly larger than MFVL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFG follows a active selection strategy; MFVL uses index tracking.
- TMFG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFG | MFVL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $360M | $7M |
| Since | 2014 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.26% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.15% | — |
| Max drawdown | -33.66% | -7.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFG and MFVL
Explore further