Screener
TMFM vs IJK
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
Key differences
- IJK costs 0.68% less per year.
- IJK is significantly larger than TMFM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFM follows a active selection strategy; IJK uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IJK has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IJK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFM | IJK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $117M | $10.6B |
| Since | 2014 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -19.6% | +30.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.5% | +18.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.03 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.99% | 17.21% |
| Max drawdown | -31.75% | -39.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFM and IJK
Explore further