Screener
TMFM vs ISCG
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- ISCG costs 0.79% less per year.
- ISCG is significantly larger than TMFM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFM follows a active selection strategy; ISCG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ISCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ISCG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFM | ISCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $117M | $947M |
| Since | 2014 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -19.6% | +34.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.5% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.03 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.99% | 18.24% |
| Max drawdown | -31.75% | -41.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFM and ISCG
Explore further