Screener
TMFM vs QTJL
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
Key differences
- QTJL costs 0.06% less per year.
- TMFM is significantly larger than QTJL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFM is classified as equity, while QTJL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- TMFM follows a active selection strategy; QTJL uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, QTJL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TMFM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFM | QTJL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $117M | $27M |
| Since | 2014 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | -19.6% | +24.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.5% | +19.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.03 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.99% | 10.26% |
| Max drawdown | -31.75% | -33.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFM and QTJL
Explore further