Screener
TMFS vs ACSG
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF vs American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
Key differences
- ACSG costs 0.36% less per year.
- TMFS is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFS | ACSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $15M |
| Since | 2018 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +0.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.64% | — |
| Max drawdown | -48.79% | -13.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFS and ACSG
Explore further