Screener
TMFS vs FNY
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF vs First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- FNY costs 0.12% less per year.
- FNY is significantly larger than TMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFS follows a active selection strategy; FNY uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FNY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FNY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFS | FNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.73% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $518M |
| Since | 2018 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +1.4% | +31.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.6% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.7% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.56% | 19.81% |
| Max drawdown | -48.79% | -38.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFS and FNY
Explore further