Screener
TMFS vs ISCG
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF vs iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- ISCG costs 0.79% less per year.
- ISCG is significantly larger than TMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFS follows a active selection strategy; ISCG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ISCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ISCG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFS | ISCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $947M |
| Since | 2018 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +0.1% | +34.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.9% | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.64% | 18.24% |
| Max drawdown | -48.79% | -41.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFS and ISCG
Explore further