Screener
TMFS vs MFMO
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF vs Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF
Key differences
- MFMO costs 0.35% less per year.
- TMFS is significantly larger than MFMO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFS follows a active selection strategy; MFMO uses index tracking.
- TMFS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFS | MFMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $7M |
| Since | 2018 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +1.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.56% | — |
| Max drawdown | -48.79% | -12.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFS and MFMO
Explore further