Screener
TMFS vs PSC
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF vs Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
Both TMFS and PSC are equity ETFs. TMFS charges 0.85% a year and PSC 0.38%. The main difference: TMFS follows a active selection strategy; PSC uses index tracking.
- TMFS follows a active selection strategy; PSC uses index tracking.
- PSC costs 0.47% less per year.
- PSC is much larger than TMFS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, PSC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFS | PSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $59M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2018 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.9% | +28.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | +18.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.1% | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.89% | 19.02% |
| Max drawdown | -48.79% | -46.75% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.