Screener
TMFS vs QTJL
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF vs Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
Key differences
- QTJL costs 0.06% less per year.
- TMFS is classified as equity, while QTJL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- TMFS follows a active selection strategy; QTJL uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, QTJL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFS | QTJL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $27M |
| Since | 2018 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +0.1% | +24.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | +19.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.64% | 10.26% |
| Max drawdown | -48.79% | -33.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFS and QTJL
Explore further